Also why stick with someone from 80 years ago when the research has moved on...and on...and on several times over.
-
-
The alternatives are absolutely not viable. And until this is acknowledged and addressed this argument had no standing. Nor do you know the thing you are engaging. We have taught every thing demanded gar more comprehensively and widely than you understand.
-
And the most obvious tell about this is you seem to think this is 1) the first time we incountered the issue and 2) the first historian we have discussed this with. You are shadowboxing.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.