However, this article goes beyond simply reconstructing her cranial features. It makes several comments regarding her race. Namely, that she exhibited both 'black' and 'white' features.pic.twitter.com/KSHaCLMsjR
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
But it reaffirms the problems we have when discussing identity in the archaeological record. I'm fairly certain that with burials found that have been deemed "Anglo-Saxon" we haven't done cranial recon to see what 'white' features they have.
See also the recon of the Kennewick Man's face and how it reaffirmed the bullshit from the archaeologists that he was not related to the Umatilla peoples and other Indigenous groups in the area, and their refusal to allow others to test his DNA.
Cycling back to what @ISASaxonists and @erik_kaars are looking for with these African women, it is frustrating that when there is scholarly info it falls into the problems I outlined above but it is frequently ignored and pushed aside.
Even the Ivory Bangle Lady, aside from that article, has few scholarly articles on her that I can find.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.