Doing my bibliography is perhaps one of my least favourite things, as is correcting and changing footnotes, but I figure I should start updating my bibliography with stuff from my current chapter and wow even without doing this under pressure like I have in the past 1/
Only what the other PhDs were told, and what I heard from Immo.
-
-
But yeah this seems to just be communicated via word of mouth. It is however also the standard at other Irish universities for the history departments.
-
I guess since none of my students (except as co-supervised by Immo) are doing Irish history, IHS is less critical
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I mean, I guess if it says decide on conventions together with supervisor, and supervisor says IHS, then that’s what it is, but it should be open to discussion.
-
Well going back over an email it was communicated to me that it’s just a guideline ultimately. But I had more than a few other PhDs say that it had to be IHS. The problem with IHS is they don’t have bibliographical references, only footnotes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.