When some research you've written shows similarities with some other work, it is natural I think to be upset or indignant at the possibility of plagiarism. However, I have seen on more than a few occasions historians coming to the same conclusions or having similar theories 1/
-
Show this thread
-
without knowing about other work previously written on it. I'm constantly doing research into my very niche topic and I'm still finding pubs (not even new ones) that explore areas that I examine too. I can do what I can to find everything, but honestly it worries me a lot 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
as an ECR that my character and research capabilities may be torn apart on social media because I forgot to check something, missed a publication, etc. 3/
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
there is basically no space for ECRs but especially BIPOC, queer, and disabled ones to make errors whereas older, tenured, white men often get away with plenty. 4/
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likesShow this thread
And but using terms like "duplication" implies agency and malice, it is not a neutral phrase to throw around. Yes this is a subtweet. 5/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.