When some research you've written shows similarities with some other work, it is natural I think to be upset or indignant at the possibility of plagiarism. However, I have seen on more than a few occasions historians coming to the same conclusions or having similar theories 1/
-
-
there is basically no space for ECRs but especially BIPOC, queer, and disabled ones to make errors whereas older, tenured, white men often get away with plenty. 4/
Show this thread -
And but using terms like "duplication" implies agency and malice, it is not a neutral phrase to throw around. Yes this is a subtweet. 5/
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.