RU aware one of the authors in question has already tweeted about how their piece grew out of work with indigenous colleagues? & there’s a whole sf series >30 years old that recasts Beowulf as settler colonial/indigenous interaction? Unless u have proof, why tweet accusations?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My point is pretty simple: don’t spread unproved accusations as if they were true, and don’t assume malice without cause. If you have an objection to those principles, then carry on.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But that’s not what was said. AM tweeted he hasn’t published this for Reasons. Not everybody reads ITM or even social media chatter as scholarship. Ideas from conferences frequently get shared w/o attribution. Saying definitively “Adam’s work” was plagiarized implies intent.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ADMedievalist
Dr. Shyama R Retweeted Erik "Mr. Bloodaxe" Wade
"people are unaware of the internet, what is a google" oh wait no, since the volume also cites blogshttps://twitter.com/erik_kaars/status/1212792331860140033?s=20 …
Dr. Shyama R added,
3 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @MedievalPhDemon
Are we talking about the ECR editors? Or two ECR authors, one of whom has addressed this? You think the editors should’ve been more hands on? Cool. You think the authors should have done more/different groundwork? Fine. Accusations of not-actual plagiarism by tweetstorm? Not ok
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It’s literally plagiarism, ma’am.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.