RU aware one of the authors in question has already tweeted about how their piece grew out of work with indigenous colleagues? & there’s a whole sf series >30 years old that recasts Beowulf as settler colonial/indigenous interaction? Unless u have proof, why tweet accusations?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My point is pretty simple: don’t spread unproved accusations as if they were true, and don’t assume malice without cause. If you have an objection to those principles, then carry on.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But that’s not what was said. AM tweeted he hasn’t published this for Reasons. Not everybody reads ITM or even social media chatter as scholarship. Ideas from conferences frequently get shared w/o attribution. Saying definitively “Adam’s work” was plagiarized implies intent.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ADMedievalist
Dr. Shyama R Retweeted Erik "Mr. Bloodaxe" Wade
"people are unaware of the internet, what is a google" oh wait no, since the volume also cites blogshttps://twitter.com/erik_kaars/status/1212792331860140033?s=20 …
Dr. Shyama R added,
3 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @MedievalPhDemon
I’ve addressed my points more than once. 1st it’s best not to make such accusations on Twitter/social media, bc no matter the actual facts, the “truth” is what people remember. 2nd is don’t accuse w/o proof. 3rd is don’t assume malice when other possibilities exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The proof is that they were aware of Adam’s work and didn’t cite him. That’s the damn truth. Why are you defending plagiarism?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.