-
-
1 reply 220 retweets 757 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 148 retweets 615 likesShow this thread -
-
2 replies 123 retweets 584 likesShow this thread -
3 replies 659 retweets 1,582 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @popelizbet
..."ancient Celtic" is meaningless as a descriptor because it spanned like 1000 years and western Europe and several disparate cultures *and didn't leave written records*.
3 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep @popelizbet
From the follow on what they appear to mean is "early medieval Ireland" and for things concerning kingship in early Ireland you want
@AdmiralHip who knows all the things even if she won't admit it.1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep @popelizbet
I don’t know all the things but I know this: don’t use Celtic as an ethnonym for early med Irish, it’s nonsense. Satirists were...sort of respected but they weren’t like all powerful king destroyers. They were respected in a disrespectful way, if that makes any sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
As far as interracial or class marriages, I mean, that’s true enough but women from outside of the tuath (the home territory, it’s a difficult term) generally were of lower status and their sons were often too. Not always but often.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.