It’s also been disheartening & demoralizing to see how those who want to argue with the antiracist scholars are doing so by: questioning their credentials, calling them imbeciles, ridiculing their supppsed lack of knowledge — or, as here, looking for any shall thing to critique.
-
-
And so you decided to say all this because he “dogpiles” (he doesn’t) and also because you find it triggering? You didn’t think it more valuable to approach him in good faith?
-
Or to just mute, not look at the book, and carry on?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Please read again what I wrote. It’s an analogy. A short title like that is open to misreading & drawing conclusions about the author’s attitudes in the way he and others have misread &c statements by others — & used them to dogpile for months.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I do not understand why y’all are so focused on my choice of the book title as an example. I could just as easily have pointed out the hypocrisy of sharing screenshots of locked/private posts on public Twitter & crying victim when someone else does it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.