The MFP is what they call the Medieval Family Program. Started in 506 from the Synod of Agde, when the consanguinity prescriptions began properly, according to them.
-
Show this thread
-
Okay so, they start from this date, except for places not yet converted, and they include them after they were properly brought into Church administration.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
So this is in effect a rolling impact presumably, as more and more bishoprics are established. This is interesting to me, methodologically, because it assumes that "Church influence" is congruent with bishoprics/admin, rather than a general societal impact.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
As far as I can tell, they do not acknowledge the enforcement of these rules would not have really been possible, at a late or early stage, and would have been targeted towards elites (who received dispensation often or flouted the rules).
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Here is the bit about monasteries.pic.twitter.com/nyIXdpsKWp
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
However the more I read this, the more I am unsettled by the premise that exposure to the Church results in "individualism, creativity, embeddedness, and analytical thinking."
1 reply 3 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
I see Mitterauer cited here, a few other historians like De Jong, but a lot of articles on consanguinity from other scientists.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
And perhaps I am reading this wrong. But it seems to me that this is comparing "The West" as it were with non-Christian, non-Western societies, that from their map seem to be African/Asian nations, with these outcomes. That is...idk. But it unsettles me, guys.
2 replies 2 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Eurocentric at best. But that's not a good thing.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
@prof_gabriele and@ISASaxonists wrote an article in@TIME regarding this and the misuse of medieval history among the far right:https://time.com/5734697/middle-ages-mistakes/ …1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread
Dr C. M. Bromstick 🧹, Dublin Retweeted Erik "Mr. Bloodaxe" Wade
@erik_kaars did a great breakdown of why this study had so many problems, and why it is nonsensical.https://twitter.com/erik_kaars/status/1198192838195986434 …
Dr C. M. Bromstick 🧹, Dublin added,
-
-
Dr C. M. Bromstick 🧹, Dublin Retweeted Jacob Ari Labendz (Dr. J. 🦁 🦢)
Another great (and short) thread on the issues of this study.https://twitter.com/Jacob_Labendz/status/1193181278696284161 …
Dr C. M. Bromstick 🧹, Dublin added,
Jacob Ari Labendz (Dr. J. 🦁 🦢) @Jacob_LabendzThis thread explains why this journalistic take on a ev-psych study (and, it seems the study too) gets much wrong. It’s also far too kind. Dressed up in science, this is simply a circular case for white supremacy almost indistinguishable from Kevin McDonald’s drivel. 1/4 https://twitter.com/mccormick_ted/status/1193028975951519745 …Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.