Sounds like many tweeters have not taken the time to look at the actual paper. We do use Medieval data, and in fact, compiled multiple new datasets from existing sources. All of our datasets can be traced to the original sources.https://twitter.com/AdmiralHip/status/1193916378245484545 …
-
-
Replying to @JoHenrich
Data, datasets, sources, all those terms need to be qualified or they are empty husks.
@AdmiralHip is right to make you aware of the important absence of data but it is not good that she had to.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @DrWorsTen @JoHenrich
I see the link to the supplemental, but I did not see an indication that it was where the medieval data was, so I didn’t check it. Someone else informed me incorrectly you used contemporary data last night.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The data are always in the supplement. That’s how articles in Science (which has strict word limits in the main text) work. It’s a convention. Anyone who hasn’t read a Science article before may be excused for not knowing it. But now this dead horse no longer needs beating.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Well, I didn’t know it. And I asked for help yesterday and people didn’t seem to know either. Including, it seems, some scientists.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.