They didn’t use medieval sources.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @samuelmehr @prof_gabriele and
They would have discovered, if they bothered to do any reading even of the secondary sources, that we cannot even get accurate medieval data. It doesn’t exist. It’s sparse and uneven. They also would have learned this study is inherently flawed and impossible to prove.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @samuelmehr @prof_gabriele and
Are you saying this to me, or the author of the piece?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @samuelmehr @prof_gabriele and
Lol so much for being my comrade. I didn’t see this and I asked several times for it to be pointed out. I read the paper several times, whereas you yesterday said you had not. The data cannot account for the whole of the medieval period.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I am becoming less and less gracious here. I said I read it. I missed the supplement, yes. But to be clear, I said several times yesterday that if they used medieval data, then it cannot be accurate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.