If we are speaking to population diversity, and would wish to describe the population of Early Mediaeval England, we’d call it Anglo-Saxon-Jute-Romano-British studies one would imagine. In any case, it less about terminological exactitude regarding a period which has been
-
-
My way of thinking is that tying a period to a contemporary geographical area has greater utility than calling a period “Anglo-Saxon”. No Jutes? No Irish? No Ramano-Britons? England has always been a place of many peoples. IMHO if we wish to label that period, geographical
-
designation has greater utility than a fictive imagined community which Anglo-Saxon clearly denotes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
100 times this!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.