I’ve been shaking my head at this study since reports of its groundbreaking (ahem) findings. It’s one more example of a mow sadly routine problem, researchers outside the Humanities writing on Humanities topics without any recourse to Humanities expertisehttps://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6466/eaau5141.full …
-
Show this thread
-
This isn’t about gatekeeping by the discipline or sector: it’s about encouraging proper engagement and respecting disciplinary expertise and training within the academy.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Malcolm Choat Retweeted Dr C. M. Bromstick 🧹, Dublin
I was going to iterate the issue with this work, but I’ll leave it to an expert,
@AdmiralHiphttps://twitter.com/admiralhip/status/1192869222759763968?s=21 …Malcolm Choat added,
Dr C. M. Bromstick 🧹, Dublin @AdmiralHipSince several scientists can't just take the word of however many medievalists (not just historians either) have said this is bad scholarship, and why, here are some sources. Because I'm feeling generous. https://twitter.com/prof_gabriele/status/1192655774029406209 …Show this thread1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @malfy_c
I’m far from an expert, just a medievalist who has read the experts and has some common sense. But thank you :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
Hey, compared to this papyrologist/Copticist/forgerologist you’ve got mad expertise, and I found your thread super informative- thanks for taking the time to write it!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.