Interesting. I’m not surprised historians are pushing back, because that’ll happen either way (i.e. whether or not there’s good reason). I’m interested is seeing commentary from historians, so I can figure things out for myself. Do you know of any other takes worth reading?
They cite few medieval historians, in particular older works, no primary sources from what I can see, and works that have been refuted. They do not engage with the vast scholarship on this topic. Also, it is Eurocentric, and progressivist.
-
-
Thanks! I started writing down a few misc thoughts about how psychology and history would differentially approach the Q of how to do history of a psychology (e.g. WEIRD psychology) – but I think I need to think about it more. Am looking forward to reading the formal critiques.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.