Considering the overwhelming response from people who actually study this stuff for a living, if they did get a peer review then they didn’t do a good job.
Except we're not just saying, this experience is wrong because it runs counter to mine. It's that it literally does not acknowledge the work done here. I will now direct you to some sources and a few points I made here:https://twitter.com/AdmiralHip/status/1192869222759763968 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Honestly, the further I've read the paper itself, the worse it is. It's Eurocentric, it does in fact cite historians but poorly and not extensively, it does not engage in the vast scholarly debates on the matter, and it's data sets cannot be accurate b/c we have very little data.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.