1) I’ve not seen anyone critique his scholarship 2) a person can write good scholarship and still be a bully 3) a person can say/do things that contradict “progressive” work 4) you can’t simply separate the person from the work.https://twitter.com/slewisimpson/status/1185109136847097856 …
-
-
You have a platform and like Dr MRO said you could have just denounced his behaviour instead of imploring us to read his scholarship, as many of us already have because we work in the field.
-
There is a problem of white supremacy. So again I will ask, what was the point of your original tweet if not to somehow centre a man in a positive way who has been acting terribly to BIPOC and ECRs?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No one said anything about his work, so it's a red herring, C.M. This is all besides the point.
-
Yes exactly. If you do not approve of the bullying and abuse and the white supremacy, then say that. Don’t use the excuse of living in NFD as being not near the debate. I live on an island in the Atlantic too. No excuse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.