TFW an established academic changes the name of a text to suit his purposes but then in another article uses the old and outdated name for a different text because he feels like it's more accurate, even though no one calls it that anymore.
essentially this person is consistently full of it. Not naming names. This guy has done some great work, my thesis relies on some of it, but everyone fawns over what he does like he's faultless, unless they have a personal beef with him.