Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @AdeleDeweyLopez

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @AdeleDeweyLopez

  1. 3. sij

    aesthetic is a pernicious substitute for morality

    Poništi
  2. underrated fact: there is no russell's paradox if you use linear logic unrestricted comprehension is just fine and implies all (iirc) the zfc axioms

    Poništi
  3. looking forward to seeing the new star wars movie, which is either the absolute worst box office movie ever, or actually pretty ok if not amazing

    Poništi
  4. so maxwell's equations end up being inconsistent if you assume point charges due to usual physics bs but! it's all fine if instead of charges you just have little wormholes so cute! idk how i could even believe in charges again

    Poništi
  5. Poništi
  6. i'm sick of rationalists pretending like language is for communicating information it objectively evolved for cooperation, and communicating information is only incidental to this it is not perverse for people to spend word negentropy to facilitate cooperation!

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    7. lip 2019.

    Before I take a shower: I hate it in there, the wet world is a bad place While in the shower: I remember now that this is a good place, it is the dry world that is the enemy

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. even if that is the case, i think it's better to set your focus more broadly than on your former culture (with the main exception being ones that deliberately try to trap people in them, in that case i think it's important for there to be an obvious opposition to escape to)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. instead, it's usually much better to think of yourself as being against toxicity itself, and to align yourself with people who are against it in general in particular, it's usually a mistake to assume that the toxicity of your former culture arises from its defining traits

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. anyway, this means that if you are in a toxic culture, and then realize that it's toxic, you should avoid aligning yourself with an opposing culture (and speaking publicly against your original culture automatically does this) since it is very likely to be similarly toxic

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. toxic cultures tend to make opposing cultures toxic 1. toxicity is hard to directly fight without toxicity 2. dissidents joining the opposing culture import toxic habits 3. these induce a positive feedback cycle

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 8. pro 2019.

    hot take: porn is just another type of entertainment, and is good or bad for pretty much the same reasons other entertainment is good or bad

    Poništi
  13. do we know the reason why physics PDEs tend to be second order?

    Poništi
  14. a very fast clock is right multiple times per second

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. stu 2019.

    Your own insecurities don't just hurt you, they also hurts people around you. There's the classic example of the thin girl complaining about being too fat in front of her fat friend and making her fat friend feel even worse about her body but it's also harmful in subtler ways.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. stu 2019.

    Visualizing SL₂ℤ: Identify SL₂ℝ (which is a solid torus) with the complement of a solid torus in ℝ³ plus a point at ∞ for the identity. The elements of SL₂ℤ are the dots, colored by type (hyp/ell/par), sized by 1/norm. SL₂ℤ is discrete, hence the picture is bounded.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 8. stu 2019.

    but i think this issue is drawing out another distinction between leftish people progressive people value 1, 2 and 6, while liberaltarians only care about 1 and 6

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 8. stu 2019.

    these moral foundations come from 's research 1. Caring 2. Fairness 3. Loyalty 4. Authority 5. Sanctity 6. Liberty i would add another one 7. Vengeance anyway, the idea is that conservatives value all of these, while liberals mostly just value 1, 2 and 6

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 8. stu 2019.

    since this is a values difference, each side just repeating their stance on the issue doesn't really do anything to change anyone's mind, it just makes the other people seem callous and evil

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 8. stu 2019.

    if you value fairness a lot, it seems incredibly wrong and immoral that someone has 100 billion dollars while billions of people are destitute if you don't value fairness much, it seems that since bill gates donates billions to help poor people, it's good that he has so much

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·