A few quick thoughts now that the government want to blame "the lawyers" (and by extension the judges) for terrorism policy /1https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1224281790237548544 …
-
-
It should be obvious that you can't rehabilitate people if you don't provide the resources to do it, and that applies even more so for terrorists who have strong ideological reasons for carrying out offences /9
Prikaži ovu nit -
We should be very wary of people within the government using lawyers as a scapegoat for failings in anti-terrorism policies and laws they themselves decided *but also* using terrorist attacks as means too implement an anti-rule of law agenda e.g. diluting the Human Rights Act /10
Prikaži ovu nit -
I wrote this a couple of years ago but it is evergreen in a sense as we often respond to terrorism in very similar ways https://eachother.org.uk/how-we-respond-to-terror/ … /11
Prikaži ovu nit -
For example, this is always the case https://eachother.org.uk/how-we-respond-to-terror/ …pic.twitter.com/eqvmmUgqJj
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
What ruling are you referring to? The ECtHR has never ruled that indeterminate sentences are unlawful. As I say in the thread
Kraj razgovora
-
-
-
I wonder who was the infamous justice secretary responsible for prison reforms who is so incompetent only Failing Grayling top him as
alchemist of the year. The one who was so rubbish even Treeza sacked him...while we have to live with the consequences... - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.