Adam W. Schindler

I have to admit, I am skeptical. How do we know she didn't just buy tickets or a t-shirt? How is this "proof" of anything?

Good question. The pic itself does not prove anything. The context does. And the eye witnesses.

She was arrested inside. There is video. Her 17 cats are going to be lonely tonight.

Disrupting a Senate hearing is a crime punishable by up to 6 months in jail. Therefore CONSPIRING to pay people to commit that crime is also a punishable offense. FOLLOW THE MONEY.

However the interested investigating agency needs to find this gentleman and verify the nature of the transaction

DNC “charity” I’d wager ^_^

What does this prove?

Nothing.

Nothing malicious. Just want the American people to know much of this protest is by compensated activists. That matters to many when trying to make sense of what’s happening right now.

But how does this picture prove that much of this protest is by compensated activists

It is but one of many pieces of data that fall right in line with what many who WERE protestors have already testified. THEY ARE PAID, and they are paid with SOROS CORPORATION money. It is the intentional destruction of the traditional American culture.

But how does this picture provide evidence?

By aligning it with the rest of the data. When you have the meeting, the transfer of cash, the attendance at the event, the disruption by those paid, and the STRING OF OVER TWO YEARS OF THIS, combined with participant testimony, it becomes circumstantial evidence. Admissible.

But how does this picture prove transfer of cash?