That was true of the Irish in the US I'm sure. The Spicer's, the Flynn's, the Ryan's. Your rationality is hiding bias.
-
-
-
I'm sure I possess plenty of biases, just like everyone else. In this case, these data aren't mine so don't shoot the messenger
-
Is it corrected for age, gender, education level? The point is not to judge people based on behaviour of their group.
-
If a migrant group is bad news I doubt national governments care much about the causes, they just want them to keep them out...
-
I'm talking about individual human beings. A group being overrepresented on a graph does not mean each member is bad news.
-
Indeed - there are always exceptions that prove the rule. But it's hard to make national policy on an indivdual level.
-
It's very easy. You can use points system like the Australians.
-
Yep - except I'm not sure it applies to refugees.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's Norway! US arabs hav more human capital than average and r doctors/lawyers.Y? Bcoz capitalism more inclusive than social democracy
-
It's not quite that simple, depends which migrant group you look at eg Somalians don't perform well either side of the Atlantic.
-
There is always more than 1 factor but US is great at turning poor violent communities better off (Scot/Irish borderers were the original!)
-
Not necessarily - look at the enduringly high levels of poverty and violence in many African American communities in the USA.
-
Many African Americans never got proper access to inclusive institutions, kept out of ordinary labour markets. A terrible legacy of slavery.
-
Indeed - hence the US is not necessarily going to increase the human capital of all groups.
-
it does of almost all *willing* migrant communities. The UK is not too bad either !
-
The US has a less cushy welfare state so Somalis work harder than in Sweden, still 50% unemployed though :http://www.thelocal.se/20121105/44236
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Just reading the buzzfeed article about you. Keep up the good work.
-
Which way is it. Equal human capital or not. The article can't even agree.pic.twitter.com/mKq4HQjhte
-
Indeed - it's classic PC double talk. You should ask Prof Portes to clarify, although you'll risk the same fate as this chap:pic.twitter.com/GwBwU14Beb
-
Or why is it that corporates favour immigration if there is no cost benefit (wage compression).
-
The only way to explain that away is via productivity advantages of newcomers which calls into question education in the UK.
-
Well then perhaps our education system is at fault? No can't change that.
-
Maybe the welfare state is a disincentive to employment/productivity? No another PC piety that shouldn't be challenged.
-
Yes, check out this astute rebuttal of Prof Portes by
@neilwilson :pic.twitter.com/g2yJzfz2E3
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.