In principle, if quantum mechanics holds up, does entanglement allow breaking memory and speed limits in Seth Lloyd's http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9908043.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong If there's anyone alive whom I would trust to have correctly taken account of QM in such calculations, it would be Seth Lloyd.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidad
@davidad then where is the accounting? :-)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
@davidad the big idea is that perhaps entanglement allows superluminal information sending just not regular signaling. Computation counts.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong Oh. Well, admissible superluminal communication is not what I would call "quantum mechanics holds up" :P2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidad
@davidad in 'orthodoxy' as understood by, for example quantum teleportation folks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong quantum teleportation uses classical communication as a primitive--it isn't any more superluminal than Star Trek teleportation3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidad
@davidad then, you can measure the output states, and get a different result than you otherwise could.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong@davidad Entanglement can't send superluminal bits, but it can let you get by w/ LESS communication: http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.34651 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AdamMarblestone
@AdamMarblestone@DanielleFong That is a very nonobvious and good answer! All the more awesome that you wrote it...forgot you once did QC/QI1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@davidad @DanielleFong
Thanks! Amazing that Bell violations are useful... but Lloyd is probably right anyway. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_pseudo-telepathy …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.