Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
AdamMarblestone's profile
Adam Marblestone
Adam Marblestone
Adam Marblestone
@AdamMarblestone

Tweets

Adam Marblestone

@AdamMarblestone

Technologist, Scientist

adammarblestone.org
Joined February 2009

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. john sakon‏ @jjsakon Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @neurograce @seanmcarroll

      Movshon and Seung had this debate in 2012. I’m more convinced by Tony’s position (wide funding spread with limited top-down organization) than Sebastian’s (more Allen-like) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q4KrhDZQ088 … Both have merits, but who’s to say current balance isn’t ideal?

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Grace Lindsay‏ @neurograce Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @jjsakon @seanmcarroll

      The current balance is still very far towards small uncoordinated efforts. Given how pleased people seem with the products of the Allen it seems clear that more efforts like that should be made. Basing beliefs about basic facts of the brain on a patchwork of indi studies is risky

      4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
    3. David Schoppik‏ @schoppik Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @neurograce @jjsakon @seanmcarroll

      Riskier than putting all your eggs in one (tech-driven) basket? Hard pass, thanks.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. Grace Lindsay‏ @neurograce Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @schoppik @jjsakon @seanmcarroll

      We are soooo far from an all-Allen research landscape that even creating 10x as many such initiatives would still leave a lot of individual labs. I'm also not sure what's aversive about a tech driven approach? Their projects are well carried out, are they not?

      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
    5. Grace Lindsay‏ @neurograce Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @neurograce @schoppik and

      If every small lab could carry out their own pet experiments with the quality of the Allen that would surely be great! The only downside is that practically that means fewer labs exploring fewer individual things. But I dont see any problem with well-executed, tech-driven studies

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. Alex Naka‏ @gottapatchemall Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @neurograce @schoppik and

      another thing to consider is how incentives/advancement would work for scientists in a world with 10x more Allen Institute type organizations; it seems like the current model of everyone-needs-their-own-paper would have to change a lot

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    7. Grace Lindsay‏ @neurograce Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @gottapatchemall @schoppik and

      That sounds great!

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Adam Marblestone‏ @AdamMarblestone Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @neurograce @gottapatchemall and

      Was proposed here as well: http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/rmy5/files/2017/06/brain_observatory_paper.pdf … Strong agree. I just don’t see how certain key tech can be built otherwise. Would remain 1000s of individual labs too as you say.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    9. Adam Marblestone‏ @AdamMarblestone Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @AdamMarblestone @neurograce and

      In general in bio, I see a big gap in the funding of 20-100 M$ scale projects to develop tech or infra to collect data we want. Of which several are needed. Examples: Etruscan shrew connectome, screen all combos of aging drugs/factors, scale up sc-proteomics tech, etc @ArtirKel

      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
    10. Adam Marblestone‏ @AdamMarblestone Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @AdamMarblestone @neurograce and

      There is no reason we should think the complexity of biological systems is magically perfectly matched to the contingent sociological happenstance of our current dominant organization of science intensive engineering and engineering intensive science!!!

      3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes
      Adam Marblestone‏ @AdamMarblestone Apr 6
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @AdamMarblestone @neurograce and

      (I just pinned this tweet to my timeline. This is essentially the reason for my existence.)

      10:04 AM - 6 Apr 2020
      • 5 Likes
      • Alex Naka Aidan Rocke Younes Subhi john sakon José Luis Ricón Fernández de la Puente
      0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info