These are awesome, and resonant with thoughts I’ve had about how to improve science. A few comments on some of them... https://twitter.com/socialimpactvc/status/1209063484580933633 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Regarding deep analysis of NIH and NSF, I wonder if
@open_phil has good materials available for some of what they’ve done. One amazing thing they did was to take NIH transformative high-risk high reward grants and just fund some of those that NIH didn’t:https://www.openphilanthropy.org/scientific-research-grants-2016-nih-transformative-research-award-rfp …2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Regarding making tacit knowledge of how fields are doing more explicit, this relates to the rationale for Beagle http://web.mit.edu/amarbles/www/docs/Beagle_combined_140905_extracted.pdf … But what would *really* make scientists use existing tools like
@hypothes_is to annotate more? Maybe more twitter integration...4 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
We think: Better social features (native, not just twitter), better integration with more content platforms and more partnerships, like with
@biorxivpreprint. Also, other top asks are for controlled tagging vocabularies, integrated export and more.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.