These are awesome, and resonant with thoughts I’ve had about how to improve science. A few comments on some of them... https://twitter.com/socialimpactvc/status/1209063484580933633 …
-
-
That would be an actionable hypothesis: one should triple the size of the TR01 type programs. And OpenPhil made at least a step into doing a real synthetic experiment on that, which was made easier by those grants being already written.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Regarding making tacit knowledge of how fields are doing more explicit, this relates to the rationale for Beagle http://web.mit.edu/amarbles/www/docs/Beagle_combined_140905_extracted.pdf … But what would *really* make scientists use existing tools like
@hypothes_is to annotate more? Maybe more twitter integration...Show this thread -
To find existing such summaries, https://ricon.dev/ by
@ArtirKel looks promising as it puts reviews up top. You just have to start with some relevant example paper for your field of interest.Show this thread - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.