@KordingLab @AdamMarblestone what say ye?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627319306956 …
i thought you disagreed with that?
-
-
have gone further and that this paper does a better job. We mostly asked what was the minimum number of electrodes you would need and what that would imply for trace widths. Now, this paper gives a specific proposal in the oversampled regime, w/ ~ as many electrodes as neurons.
-
It runs up closely against heating by the amplifiers, and it requires 30 nanometer lithography on a diamond CYLINDER... But it is a more specific existence proof than we had that operates within the same limits we talk about.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.