AMAZING group of speakers. Has the potential to be one of those meetings that everyone looks back on as the catalyst for major progress in the fieldhttps://twitter.com/TonyZador/status/1164231768368713728 …
-
Show this thread
-
Alternatively, it could turn out to be a meeting where every speaker just talks about how they think the brain does deep learning, which is interesting, but I'm not sure would be particularly helpful for driving progress in AI.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
David A. Markowitz Retweeted David Pfau
I hope this meeting will feature a few people who are willing to stir the pot with contrarian views, e.g.https://twitter.com/pfau/status/1105443964423938049 …
David A. Markowitz added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @neurowitz
Deep learning is clearly where nearly everyone’s mind is these days because it has been so helpful to neuro compared to previous frameworks. The action to watch is in the details, not categorical rejection of DL, at least not without good reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @SussilloDavid @neurowitz
You finally stirred the pot enough to elicit a response!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SussilloDavid @neurowitz
Hopefully
@SebastianSeung will describe a Michelson-Morley analog in-progress:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B2Ukzffv8Lk …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
But remember back in 2015 when the contrarian view was that DL might be relevant?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.