things science needs:
- grants to reward risk over incremental innovation
- micro-bounties for specific research breakthroughs
- rewards for 'whistleblowing' on assumptions
- more funding for basic research
**more people thinking about this stuff**
cc: @james_ough @alexeyguzey
Cool! I take issue with many of the specifics of this one, but it is heading in a good direction and if you imagine draft 102337.4 of refinement and extension of this, that is the kind of artifact that I think would help. Then “high risk”, “high impact” is relative to such...
