Let us not place roadblocks by introducing labels. I may not have eye contact with you but can still be a diligently listener. As long as an individual is interested, engaged and participatory (if needed), it should be fine. Thanks Adam.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Awesome- now to re-educate recruiters to not rely on such an archaic assessment rule of thumb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This concurs with my experience! Thanks for sharing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How did these people work and have child care before Covid?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let's be honest, maintaining consistent eye contact with anyone through an entire conversation would be crazy awkward. 50%-70% is quite a bit. 100% becomes downright unsettling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Edgar Schein also recommends dialogue without eye contact. Edgar H. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership, 5th ed. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2017), 112.pic.twitter.com/0EFkegXQWq
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.