Of course, there’s difference between a temporary measure in the face of uncertainty, and a decades-long measure that persists against established evidence. But I think it’s good to be aware of historical context when discussing long-term border measures. 2/2
-
-
Pokaż ten wątekDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
I feel incredibly ignorant that I did not know this. Wow.
-
This: I also had no idea!
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
But unless all the planes were full of people with open wounds rubbing against eachother this measure makes no sense. Whereas COVID is airborne.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
It's not really very similar though. Most people with HIV entering the UK would never pass the infection on to anyone else. Probably far less true for COVID.
-
The average is 3 people. Some people more some less. Some won’t pass onto anyone.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Worrying that people seem happy to make the same mistake again.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
Spot on Adam. There are long term implications of these seemingly ‘short term’ measures many don’t see. Especially there is a huge risk that they could be extended without clear reasons as there is no agreed framework when or under which circumstances to lift these restrictions.https://twitter.com/mugecevik/status/1359641703964168197 …
-
Hypothetical Q - if we were still in March 2019, would you have supported border entry controls? Early on in spread of an infectious disease, that makes sense? Just wondering if you'd still not be ok with the measure (presumably will not be too long term of done so)
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.