Are you serious? If so, a 0% (outright) acceptance rate says more about us as a community than about the submissions.
NDSS'20 Summer Review Cycle Acceptance Rates (107 submissions) -- 0% outright accept but 8% accept with shepherding (minor revision) and 11% invited to resubmit after major revisions.
-
-
-
I'm having a hard time deciding how I feel about it. On the one hand it feels like we as reviewers just can't get out of our own way. On the other, maybe this is the "journal-style" system working as it should. Combine major+minor rev's and the accept rate is about right.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Is there a difference between "resubmit after major revisions" and "reject"?
-
Yes – a major revision comes with a list of TODOs from the reviewers (including new experiments) that the authors are expected to carry out. The revision gets sent back to the same NDSS reviewers by Oct 9 who make the final decision.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Twitter needs a wow reaction.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I confess that this seems rather absurd and heavy-handed to me.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
That seems super low. Am I wrong?
-
I would expect that most major revisions eventually lead to acceptance – this has been the case for Oakland (14/15 in 2018, 32/41 in 2019), so it's not that bad IMO.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.