here's a clip taken from youtube of steven crowder, who @TeamYouTube have said does not violate their policies. youtube are apparently happy to have this material on their websitepic.twitter.com/NsIDtHAwCE
-
Show this thread
-
Didn’t they demonetized his channeling blocked quite a few of his videos? I don’t watch him but I understand he’s a comedian so naturally he’d have controversial stuff on his show. What I ask myself is that if we deplatform him does that protect or endanger our freedom of speech?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You’re right, there are consequences to speech. Being banned on a public forum for not violating the rules is not what might be called a natural consequence.
People opposing and arguing against his views would be. I don’t like the guy, but I’ll fight for his right to speak.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm with you on this. However, Google changed YT's TOS, which was a dumb idea, but now they have to act accordingly. Which, of course, they can't, because lack of resources, personnel, and, most importantly, clear rules and procedures.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You can't just build your own pseudo-legal ecosystem. Even if you are Google.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.