Y'all are legit saying that Principals should be allowed to infringe on a minor's right to privacy? Hell no.
5. By requiring the consent of the learner before the principal may inform the parents, the DA is directly ignoring and infringing on the rights and responsibilities of parents as the primary caregivers of their children, upending age of consent laws.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shouldn't government be secular? Voting for y'all seems to be like voting for a theocracy, which no one wants. Church and religion has no place in state and just be separated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what about the rights of children? Are you really negating the agency of a child to know who they are and what they need?
-
Moreover, are you advocating for transgender and queer kids to HAVE TO come out to their homophobic parents who believe the same kak that you do? The kind of kak that gets them killed? Are you jas?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The last time I checked kids are kids and certain rights are not available to them until they become adults. A child of 10 is very different to a child of 15 or 17. The reason, their brain is still developing. The child should choose if and when they want to have that discussion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The DA is pushing satanic agendas. This is clearly out of line.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.