You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I thought it's called doing exactly what you're doing and practicing with this tweet, exercising your Constitutional Right of choice, association, faith and freedom of speech. Is it wrong if practiced by the CJ and right when practised by you and @Africa4Pal. Just asking out loud
It's either a right for everyone or a right for no-one. There are no exclusions in the Bill of Rights.
Being in violation of the Judicial Code as found by Judicial Conduct Committee is a serious offense. That the person found against is the Chief Justice, requires of South Africans to demand his compliance with the ruling NOT defiance echoed by Israel's lobby
I tend to differ with you Sir, the Judicial Conduct Committee did what was expected to please others & infringe on the CJ freedom of speech and faith rights by forcing him to do what's good to those who don't agree with his convictions and faith. By appealing he is in compliance.
I can't say whether the JSC ruling was correct. I therefore welcome the Appeal. However, the principle of limiting rights in certain circumstances is not controversial. This does not imply an "exclusion".pic.twitter.com/Mpyl0L2WD1
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
