The food van lady was not found credible.pic.twitter.com/gQz2QW4urQ
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
A claim that workers were instructed not to ask for ID was made less credible because the affiant failed to, y'know, say when or where it happened, or how many times.pic.twitter.com/rrgOoi0RbV
As for the claim that she was told not to compare signatures, that task was completed elsewhere--which is something a competent lawyer might have felt the need to look up before alleging fraud.pic.twitter.com/cwlyMGnlHs
It sounds like a different witness signed an affidavit saying she believed the other people's affidavits? Typically, witnesses are not allowed to say whether they believe or don't believe other witnesses, and must have personal knowledge of what they're talking about. Baffling.pic.twitter.com/obX8wgLNTc
Another witness, the judge says, is simply clueless, ascribing massive ballot fraud to the use of rental vans with out-of-state plates.pic.twitter.com/ULWj8tvS5p
One guy thinks ballots have to be in sealed boxes. They don't. Another guy thought voting machines were connected to the internet. They weren't.pic.twitter.com/BF477qak6q
One thing that can hurt your credibility as a witness is already believing a conspiracy theory before you even get to be a poll watcher.pic.twitter.com/9J0MN8fnhb
This is the account of the lawyer who almost got arrested trying to get past a police officer to get into a room to decide voter eligibility. That decision was already made elsewhere, and no one was allowed in past capacity.pic.twitter.com/nEWWelcRdr
Long story short, the judge's decision is based almost entirely on the credibility of the witnesses. And he finds that, because there are other remedies available, an injunction is unnecessary, and likely harmful to the interests of Michigan voters.pic.twitter.com/axTnJSifnO
Finally, I'm not confident that spamming a court with a bunch of bogus affidavits is ethical. You really are supposed to learn what talking about, try your best to be honest, and let the Court know if something false slipped in. Not just throw stuff at the wall.pic.twitter.com/cGlnV6rqf6
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.