The trial court granted an extraordinary motion for new trial, and today, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed. Amazing work.
-
-
Show this thread
-
-
The State told the Defendant that the items had been destroyed. Then, when it took him 35 years to find the items, they say he failed to exercise sufficient diligence by believing them. That's Muscogee County for you.pic.twitter.com/52uARg0K59
Show this thread -
The Supreme Court of Georgia also calls "very troubling" the habit of prosecutors then to make it obvious they were striking jurors based on race, but did not rule on the issue. You're supposed to be subtle about it.pic.twitter.com/P30D8eWPl8
Show this thread -
Oh, also, Gates claimed that police took him to the victim's apartment and told him to touch the heater. That fingerprint evidence was a huge part of the State's case. The technician testified that police told him to dust ONLY that item in the apartment.pic.twitter.com/aq0qIUOTPI
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
His DNA had "fallen off"?
-
And only his dna. Must be very slippery dna
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s disheartening to know that when presented with someone’s innocence, the state tries its best to continue incarcerating them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why does the state fight so hard to deny justice? Don't they understand the Constitution?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I ever happen to meet a prosecutor/DA at a party, I’m gonna corner him and ask him to explain to me why the state always fights overturning convictions even when exculpatory DNA evidence or police misconduct comes to light.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.