This is not true and people repeating it are making it more difficult to address very real issues.https://twitter.com/thehill/status/847651696394199040 …
-
How do you know it's not true?
Because. Because I have covered State since 1999. Because I know people who didn't start in 2009.
-
-
That means nothing. Do you have sources who say it's not true?
-
Yes, I do.
-
You have sources who've sat in on meetings with diplomats who've observed even exchange and eye contact?
-
You had that info when this story broke already? He has his own, NEW staff, that's been there for 70 days.
-
Only one reporter has traveled with him abroad, and it's not you. And she didn't sit in on any diplomatic mtg.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait. What does 2009 have to do with now?
-
at the Obama fan -
I don't get it. I though
@AP only reported facts, not opinions. -
He didn't state a falsehood as far as I can tell- he just implied that obamas state department ppl are pushing the narrative
-
but aren't
@AP reporters supposed to be non political? Does that mean he's a Trump supporter? -
Don't be fatuous
-
Don't tell me what to do.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's superficial click bait, and we're safer if it's false, but this "argument from something to prove" isn't compelling.
-
It's unverified by you, meritless with "some" & passive voice, sloppy bc not disprovable except by finding genesis of an intended lie.
-
But "false because I have many connections (and not just to the partisan hacks!)" isn't helpful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
"It's a sea change. They literally know nothing" -
@benrhodesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.