Roberts pointed to a series of Wall Street Journal stories regarding federal judges who participated in matters involving companies in which they or their families owned stock.http://apne.ws/vlxjhgg
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ya think
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ya think?????
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems obvious, surprising it needs to said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scary that has to be said. Scarier that the judge decides whether to recuse or not.
-
I've never understood why it's up to the judge to recuse. That is absurd.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Finally something sensible out of the supreme court! It shows that deep down inside, there is some sense of ethics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Apparently, the bar is really low.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.