-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why on earth would anyone, including this judge, think a US court has any jurisdiction in Colombia???
-
It doesn't. I think the point is simply about such a status being granted to an animal in the first place. Not sure that such a ruling has happened outright in a US Court before.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Interested persons" is only slightly less bizarre of a phrase to use in reference to a hippo than "cocaine hippos" is. What a time to be alive.
-
Think I've accidentally wandered onto another planet sometimes on here ...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
William O Douglas' dissent in the 1972 Sierra Club v Morton case (which argued the trees - nature - should have standing in court) is getting a 2nd look?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are the Hippos in the US, do they have jurisdiction for this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So Colombian Hippos have more rights and protection than some American people.
-
My same thought.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.