Too little, too late. Rushing construction does have its drawbacks. Big "Uh, Oh" coming.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wondering why???? For those of us who lived through the quake of 1989 and were wise enough NOT to buy real estate on most of the landfill known as the SF Bay Area, the answer is obvious. You are on top of fault lines and man-made quicksand!
-
Wait 'til you hear about the proposed highrise on landfill off on Treasure Island.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The building foundation is in deep bay fill, not bedrock. It was stable enough until they began digging a tunnel for the local rail line, which they did not plan for in their construction on bay fill. There is no cheap fix and many warned about this before they started building.
-
bay mud is a geotechnical nightmare, is one of the worst possible substrates to build on.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Everything in SOMA is built on mud and landfill. Nothing that top heavy should have been built out that way. There's a reason SOMA has always been light industrial. Contractors and developers built out there without thought. Money money money.
-
Another building The City NEVER should have allowed is the
@salesforce tower. Too tall and too top heavy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
please no Champlain in SF
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.