Jerks
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
9-0 can’t fix that by stacking the court
-
TF was Sotomayor thinking? Even she got corrupted. Great. NO GOOD PPL ON COURT
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
While I support immigration 100%, I don't think people most who come to the United States illegally should be rewarded. That said, stop penalizing the children of these people who were born in America. They had no control over the actions of their parents.
-
I missed that part “illegally”. It says “humanitarian reasons”.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unanimous... I don't like it.. but I gotta respect it
-
I don't like it and I don't respect it. But I do understand - the ruling was based on current US immigration law. Ofc, the ppl in question are asylum seekers who applied for asylum at the border per international law. They quite literally CAN'T return to their country of origin.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You're kidding me. And the fact that it was unanimous is even worse
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Send them all to Canada, we need more good people.
#SupremeCourt#CanadaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
An undocumented immigrant that overstayed their visa could apply for LPR. Someone that crossed the border irregularly and had a family sponsor could apply for LPR. The legal distinction between lawful entry and lawful presence is senseless and harmful.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.