Millions have been taking it with zero to negligent side effects. 65% efficacy is considered good enough to use. This is much higher AND unlike Moderna & Pfizer, it doesn't have to be stored at impossibly low temps, it can be stored in normal clinic freezers.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Not high enough
-
65% is considered good enough. 76% efficacy and the fact that it can be stored in normal clinic freezers (unlike Pfizer & Moderna) is a huge deal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For AstraZeneca to say it's vaccine is 76% effective that means the company can not fully guarantee it
-
It is. Millions around the world are taking it with zero to minimal side effects. Not sure why they keep f**king up their PR.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is one I would not take no way. Don’t trust anything from them now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can this 76% figure be trusted?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.