Results released Friday show the single-shot vaccine was 66% effective overall at preventing moderate to severe illness, and much more protective against the most serious symptoms.http://apne.ws/W4bRX4D
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
soooo, would it be more effective with a booster? like the others?
-
From the article: "J&J had hedged its bets with a study of a two-dose version of its vaccine, which is still underway."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Johnson & Johnson puts cancer causing agents in their baby products. Absolutely the last company we should be trusting with vaccines.
-
If you don’t want it, don’t get it but stop peddling your garbage.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Ocugen THE ONLY WAY TO GO. 98% EFFECTIVE. CAN BE STORED WITHOUT FREEZING.CAN BE ADMINISTERED TO ELDERLY AND CHILDREN AND THE ONLY ONE WITH NO SIDE EFFECTS. AND INEXPENSIVE BUT THE BIG MONEY MEN WANT TELL YOU ABOUT IT CAUSE IT WILL GET INTO THEIR POCKET BOOKS! YELL FOR OCUGEN -
66% is actually pretty good, your average flu shot is usually around 40-70% depending on what source you're using. And this vaccine is still fairly new.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Watch them give the less powerful Johnson & Johnson
#COVID19 vaccine to the Black and poor countries/communities first.
pic.twitter.com/T3PXeWKywS - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
