Wonder how she’d vote in the lame duck period if she and Trump lose. Nothing at stake for them then.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
That’s how it should be, McConnell set the precedent 4 years ago after all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Until she loses her election and they elect someone in the lame duck session. Because these people have no integrity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why, she want to change the constitution?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And did she add, with furrowed brow, that she’s “concerned” about this? We know what that’s worth, don’t we? Nice try, but we’re not buying it.
-
Yup. "The next justice should be picked by the winner of the election" and "I will not vote to confirm anyone put forth before the election" are two WILDLY different things.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.