Of course they would.
-
-
-
No, of course they should.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Terrible news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They originally had a returning officer who would likely qualify Joshua despite pressure from the
#CCP, then they removed the officer and replaced her with another who dares to disqualify Joshua. Blatant manipulation!#StandWithHongKongThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's why genuine universal suffrage is crucial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
China has no intentions to play any fair games. Not only if CCP bans political challengers, the communist party also ban private companies. Google and Twitter are banned in China because they would trash the Chinese copycats(Baidu and Weibo).
- Show replies
-
-
-
Blindingly obvious what the government is doing here: political censorship No one believes that crap abt advocating self-determination means it’s against BL. Even after that court ruling (which is dubious.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The headline should really say:: China authorities disqualify pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong...
-
Democracy is bad, anyone who is pro-democracy is being brainwashed. As I was told by the China Communist Party.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.