No.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The answer is no, as long as Kim is there, nuclear is alive and well in DPRK
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah right, why would North Korea give up their only defense for infrastructure? You actually think Kim Jung Un wants to better his people?? If he did they would turn around and stab him in the back. Thats not what dictators of a puppet country do
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For Kim Jung Un there is zero positives for improving his country. He just needs his people satisfied enough not to revolt but he already has them where he wants them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only someone naive to North Korea's history of deception would believe that it would lead to no nukes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My
#Unequivocal Subjective,Opinion. DPRK Will Never/Ever#Denuclearize 2 Reasons. 1.#NuclearProgram Is The Highest#NationalPride In DPRK 2#Denuclearization Is Not#Beijing Agenda. DPRK Is#Puppet State Of China.#Beijing Will Not Loose,Its Lucrative#BlackMarket With DPRK.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
North Korea isn't doing to ever denuclearize voluntarily. No country that has working nukes would do so willingly. Ukraine set that precedent....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.