The striking thing with the midwit left commentariat is that they really seem to believe all solutions lie in the policy domain, as, per impossible, it was the only domain there is!! https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/994530711397978112 …
-
-
That is not correct. Tho I'm aware you wish it were otherwise. Technology obviously follows culture.
-
Also, if you think I want people to be slaves to technology you are wrong, and confusing me with
@cyborg_nomade who sees in tech a means of forcing liberation (assuming this is still his position) See point no 5 https://antinomiaimediata.wordpress.com/2016/04/23/to-the-left-1/ … And my referencehttps://antinomiaimediata.wordpress.com/2016/04/23/to-the-left-1/ … -
that's precisely my position. moreover, the whole thing of "downstream from power" needs a good definition of power (which will inevitably lead to attaching it to technology)
-
I've rehashed the whole thing with Reactionary Future a while back (it's a three part series)https://antinomiaimediata.wordpress.com/2016/08/31/neocameralism-and-constitutions/ …
-
FYI: I'm pretty sure I solved the problem of a biased Supreme Court in Go-ocracy http://theanti-puritan.blogspot.com/2018/05/go-ocracy-alternative-republic.html?m=1 …
-
you're still relying on a transcended element that enforces the rules of the game from a bird's view, which is exactly what I'm criticizing up there. a constitution is a self enforcing rule, or it isn't a constitution.
-
The transcendent element is market competition to be the most neutral supreme court.
-
you start with "someone needs to enforce the rules". market rules are self enforcing.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.