really? it looks like a fairly qualified statement to me
-
-
Replying to @Depopulator83 @ParadiseDelayed
R/acc isn't /acc? (This is getting confusing...)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
If I understand correctly, there are two axis of discussion in ACC. First, is techno-capitalism still accelerating, and fast enough for escape? Second, do we need it to?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Second: unequivocally yes. It's the first axis where U/Racc may disagree.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @parallaxoptics @Depopulator83
So R/acc thinks acceleration is slowing down and that's a bad thing? Do you think something can be done about that or is it just a cause for pessimism?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That's where all the discussion has centered, and there's no consensus. There's some pretty solid evidence that deceleration has occurred already, and due to dysgenics.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
human dysgenics could drive a transfer to machine intelligence faster though? But I could be wrong about that
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
A transfer to machine intelligence would also drive dysgenics as humans became cattle that eat from the hands of robots
-
-
Once intelligence jumps to a silicon substrate, human dysgenic ceases to matter.
0 replies 1 retweet 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.