I'm glad folk like Mises' deconstruction of the communist calculation problem. The core problem is that, in communism, the person who pays for stuff isn't the one who decides whether it gets made or not.
-
-
Replying to @Alrenous
2/ A deduction while ppl who voted for good law a credit. Gradually the irresponsible voters would lose market share. Think futarchy but with social currency instead of votes or money
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Alrenous
Money leads to inequality, and while I don't care about that, a handful of massive brokerage firms would emerge, and they might destroy the system and convert it to oligarchy. A system that converts itself into something else automatically isn't worth designing for its own sake
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AMK2934
It's going to convert itself into an oligarchy anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @AMK2934
It would quickly be restricted to a small minority. Which would be the same minority you got if you just used money. Even assuming the prediction market can in fact measure the effects.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
The minority would be much larger in a system where everyone is given social currency. It's the difference between meritocracy vs entrenched oligarchy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.